Skip to content

Could this have ARM support #468

Closed
Closed

Description

@sreid99

As per #453, this would be very useful for my ARM builds.

Ideally it would work with Buildjet's ARM based github action runners - https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions/docs/runners

Activity

  1. eregon commented on Feb 22, 2023

    @eregon
    Member

    Buildjet doesn't seem free, so not really a solution.
    Also it's not unlikely a build on some ARM machine wouldn't work on another ARM machine.
    For ARM and self-hosted, one should build/install Ruby themselves.
    More details in #90

  2. eregon commented on Mar 3, 2023

    @eregon
    Member

    With #473 this action now gives instructions for how to make it work for self-hosted runners not matching a GitHub-hosted runner image.

  3. xcskier56 commented on Jul 18, 2023

    @xcskier56

    FYI @sreid99 I ran into the same issue as you on Buildjet. I solved this by creating a local action that will build and then cache the built ruby using Buildjet's cache. Here's a gist you use https://gist.github.com/xcskier56/8559e89d53e02babecc87a52166566e5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions