Repository navigation
actions-rs/audit-check GH Action #46
Description
Folk are using this and seems the maintainer @svartalf seems MIA
There seems to be at least one fork already by @djmitche / GothernburgBitFactory:
actions-rs/audit-check#221 (comment)
GothenburgBitFactory/taskwarrior#2830 (comment)
Here:
https://github.com/GothenburgBitFactory/audit-check
Addressing:
actions-rs/audit-check#223
Would it be worthwhile to maintain a fork under GH org until the original maintainer is back
Or maybe we can just add the fork here:
https://github.com/rust-secure-code/projects
In most basic form without any actions alternative always might be something like this - but it's pain to maintain vs action-ref:
- name: Cache cargo bin
uses: actions/cache@v1
with:
path: ~/.cargo/bin
key: cargo-audit-v0.17.0
- name: Install cargo-audit
run: |
if [ ! -f $HOME/.cargo/bin/cargo-audit ]; then
cargo install cargo-audit --vers 0.17.0
fi
- name: cargo-audit
run: cargo auditThere is ofc cargo-deny GH action too:
https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/cargo-deny-action
Activity
tarcieri commentedon Aug 8, 2022
This might be a better question to post at https://github.com/RustSec as it's specifically RustSec-related.
I think it might make sense to fork the action under that org so @rustsec can manage maintenance.
tarcieri commentedon Aug 8, 2022
Somewhat related issue here: rustsec/rustsec#303
pinkforest commentedon Aug 8, 2022
I asked @Shnatsel about it yesterday and was supportive as well to under rustsec org